Am Mittwoch, 19. Juli 2006 09:41 schrieb Simon Stelling: > I can't follow, sorry. Sure, the new flag will be 'build against ff instead > of seamonkey', but then it's still valid use, no?
No, we have a flag "seamonkey" (that is already global) that means "build against seamonkey", so ff is considered default if that flag is not set. This could be discussed, but imho we definitely need a standard for that, that means one of them, firefor or seamonkey, has to die. I don't really care which one, but it should be the same for the whole tree. -- Hanno Böck Blog: http://www.hboeck.de/ GPG: 3DBD3B20 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp6WQcpDNLbC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
