Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 27 July 2006 18:21, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
Looking at the meeting log, the
council even noted that the concerns had not been addressed
no, we noted that people claimed they had concerns but when cornered and asked
what exactly their concerns were, no more responses were to be had
people need to bring up their outstanding issues now and get them addressed
Ok, since the first time around apparently wasn't good enough, how about
this? This project sucks. It takes random ebuilds without enough merit
or demand to even have some team and/or developer within Gentoo pick it
up, and dumps it to a
user-supported-yet-completely-official-break-my-gentoo-style tree that
has to potential to cause all sorts of QA problems. It flies right in
the face of those of us that have strived to educate users not to rice
out their systems with outside-the-tree ebuilds that have not gone
through some sort of arch team and/or maintainer QA before hitting the
tree. There is nothing you or anyone else can say that will make me
think otherwise, and I think it needs to be killed. Now.
-Steve
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
