Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Uh, no it wouldn't. Part of the reason we have no* flags is to avoid > dep problems. Consider: > > USE="!foo? ( some_unavailable_on_x86_package )" > > versus: > > USE="nofoo? ( some_unavailable_on_x86_package )" > > The nofoo flag can be use masked. The foo flag can't. This patch solves > that problem.
So the best fix for this is not just retaining two ways to say the same thing but actually expanding it? (!foo vs nofoo). That feels really wrong. Maybe it needs to get fixed, but is this the right way? Thanks, Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
