On Sunday 03 September 2006 15:02, Carsten Lohrke wrote: > You're wrong here. What I'm inclined about is that we had (leastwise) a > fourteen day short notice to when the releaase snapshot would be taken. To > the end of this time frame there was another one that we'd release with GCC > 4.x. Even if we had enough people to deal with everything thrown at us,it > would have been impossible to fix and stabilize the relevant packages on > all architectures. Read me well please, I mean that in the case of the accessibility packages here brought to our attention, the interval is irrelevant.
I never said that it wouldn't have helped to have it longer for many other little things, of course, and in that I agree with you. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE
pgp6Uj5M5HnaG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
