On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 01:54:02PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: > Josh Saddler wrote: > > Because as much as possible, we need to see something concrete, not "maybe > > an arch tester." We need to have a better definition of what "when needed > > is" and who these "some people" are -- think about it. Do we want a system > > that works like devship, but only halfway -- like you suggested, just > > passing the ebuild quiz -- or is something more needed? > > If it needs to be extended a new GLEP like this one can be written or this > one extended. This is only about bugzilla access, nothing more. So no, it > is meant to be as non-concrete as possible to allow usage in as many cases > as possible. > This practically means opening up bugzie to world + dog. Maybe not right now but being so non-concrete as you call it means we can never tell anybody no. All they have to do is calling themselves a contributor. Personally I think this is only going to lead to chaos and I'm not at all frilled by the idea.
If this is to go forward it needs to be well-defined - handwaving simply isn't cutting it imo. Regards, Bryan Østergaard -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
