On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 16:36:14 +0200 Stefan Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> this does not allow the actual maintainer to close the bug and > >> causes a lot of bugspam for a person who does not care about it > >> and should be only contacted in the end to commit > >> fixes/patches/bumps. > > Shouldn't matter too much as a gentoo dev is still responsible for > > the package? > > of course he is still responsible. Does not mean he likes to get 10 > mails about people asking for stable keywords and arches stabilizing > every month. That comes with being responsible for a package in Gentoo. Live with it. > > Nobody shoud be adding stuff to portage without taking > > responsibility for it. > > I am not adding stuff. I am fixing existing packages. And I am taking > responsibility. The maintainer can always assign me bugs if he thinks > I should take care of them and I read and take care of them anyway > because I am on maintainer-needed. That's fine and all, but it sort of sets a precedent - not everyone is on maintainer-needed. > PS: mailing lists are a bit broken. 3 people answer me and ask almost > the same and I answer almost the same again .. Then answer in only one subthread, and rest of them will die... :) Kind regards, -- Andrej Kacian -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
