-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:44:23 -0700 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | Portage currently has two hard-coded lists of variables that control > | the behavior of env-update. > > I realise GLEP 24 is considered not going very far, but in the > interests of what *has* been done on it... Is it worth continuing > development on env-update?
Regardless of whether or not we keep the actual env-update tool around, I think that making these variables configurable would be a good idea. It removes any lag between the time that a package maintainer needs to add a new special variable and the time that it is supported. Zac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFBaOP/ejvha5XGaMRAqR9AKC0F+Ra3Qxh8pAfdYP8h0BFv2IvtgCdHbbn I6Z1YX6yXX8SdfIreN8rbJM= =DPbS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
