On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 03:52:08PM -0400, Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:30:03 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >| On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 19:44 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> >| > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:36:16 -0500 Brian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >| > wrote:
> >| > | > ${CATEGORY}/${PN}:${SLOT}.
> >| > |
> >| > | I thought we were eventually going to use that format to specify
> >| > | deps with specific USE set.
> >| >
> >| > That's [use].
> >|
> >| I assume it is really [list of use] right?
> >
> >I think cat/pkg:slot[foo][-bar][baz] or opcat/pkg-ver:slot[foo][-bar]
> >was what was decided upon. That's how paludis does it, but it's easy
> >enough to tweak if people prefer something else...
>
> What's the point of all the square brackets? Is there some benefit over
> just [foo -bar baz]?Been awhile, but the original syntax being pushed was cat/pkg:slot1,slot2 cat/pkg[use1_on,-use2_off,-use3_on] Somewhat prefer the spaces in use rather then commas personally also, but implemented the syntax I recalled. ~harring
pgpd1lNRcLWeM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
