On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 06:18:26PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote: > Sure I did... Could you tell me why should we accumulate broken and > vulnerable junk in the tree for years? (Outdated ebuild A depends on > junky outdated ebuild B which depends on crappy, unsupported ebuilds C, > D and E which... )
Thats not the maintainer's problem but the Arch Team's problem so they are the ones that decide what to do. > Either keyword it in a reasonable time or you'll lose the keyword, damn > simple... Can't do it in X months? Sorry, too bad for your arch, the > package is gone and users will rant (or they won't, and then you don't > need the keywords in the first place). No. Arch Teams manage their keywords the way _they_ want not the way YOU or others that don't work on arch teams want. It is actually *that* simple. - ferdy -- Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git) 20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpMx13985eWE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
