On 11/13/06, Thomas de Grenier de Latour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:02:25 +0100, Alexander Skwar Though, an other reason for not accepting this patch is that some websites may expect URL like this one, which relies on both encoded and raw commas: http://foo.bar/param-1,param-2%2Cwith%2Ccommas,param-3
Huh? Both of the following requests are equivalent: http://foo.bar/param-1,param-2%2Cwith%2Ccommas,param-3 http://foo.bar/param-1%2Cparam-2%2Cwith%2Ccommas%2Cparam-3 This is because web servers are required to process the URL and unescape *any* '%' sequences. So in both cases the server 'backend' is going to see a request for: param-1,param-2,with,commas,param-3 -Richard -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list