Ned Ludd wrote: > On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 23:37 +0100, Markus Ullmann wrote: >> So to avoid thread hijacking, starting a new one. > > What exactly is this thread you are starting about? Just letting us know > you did some random testing? > I think this is a reference to news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] where I was asking about what would be a good distributed scm. Thanks for testing jokey.
There was a massive thread on the git/bzr lists which marienz pointed out, which has TBH given me a massive headache ;) The gist of what I read was that both use UUIDs, but bzr leans towards local rev ids for styles of development where full distribution is not required (ie star topographies.) Additionally, bzr makes a new rev every time there is a merge, even if nothing has changed. I like the bzr approach of providing a framework, but I guess I'm still leaning towards git, as I'm not really after a framework per se. So it's good to know you can set up a repo which will commit to a svn parent. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
