Hi,

On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 07:50:02PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Eh? Why should I stop filing bugs about stale vulnerable cruft? Should
> it stay in the tree forever (unless some $we_all_know_which_arch dev
> wakes up by miracle and moves)?

If you give away enough usable information, then sure.

Though! We have seen that, for example in bug #164182[1], that you filled
ended up in a removal of the latest stable version of imagemagick on
MIPS.

We are currently a heavy understaffed team and we would not like to see
this happen!

We are an unsupported security architecture so the maintainers can
remove anything but our keyword in that package -- that would make sure
that the MIPS users will still have a stable tree and the other
architectures users wont be affected.

Best regards,
Alexander

[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164182

-- 
Alexander Færøy
Bugday Lead
Alpha/IA64/MIPS Architecture Teams
User Relations, Quality Assurance

Attachment: pgpv4yfoSdvi3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to