On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 02:43:57PM +0100, Thomas R??sner wrote: > Brian Harring schrieb: > >On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 04:13:11AM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > >>On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:04:37 +0000 Steve Long > >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>| > I'm saying that until there is an independent implementation, the > >>| > specification is worthless and will contain huge numbers of errors. > >>| > >>| Seriously? Without an implementation, your spec of what should happen > >>| will have loads of errors? > >> > >>Yes. It will describe what people think is allowed, rather than what > >>really is. > >> > > > >If you're writing the spec to match what "people think", why limit the > ># of folks involved? > > Uhm, I think you completely inverted what Ciaran meant.
Don't think so; making the point that if attempting to write the spec to target what 'people think'... that's rather subjective, and it's easy for a subgroup of people to get ideas that don't match what others think. Possible I'm being too literal, if so feel free to correct me. ~harring
pgpfI1dtBbf7y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
