On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:44:24PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 11:35:51 +0100 Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > I find it amusing that no-one complaining about this has actually > > > asked to see it. > > > > I think ferringb did, just not very successfully. > > Not so far as I've heard...
Well, stop hitting the pipe. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/46163 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/46178 Quoting, > ciaran >> harring | Doing it formally, I hereby request access to PMS specifically with | the intention of going over it to spot where it differs from long | standing portage behaviour. And as you know all too well, given your behaviour on every previous discussion we've had related to this, you're not getting it. Two angles on the behaviour BS; either related to the fact I'm dead set on the spec reflecting portage behaviour, and being finished, or it's related to the fact the paludis devs generally speaking would be the first group of folks lining up to kick me in the balls. Which... frankly, hey, whatever. Put up with the taunts/name calling (not like I have much of a choice mind you), only thing I'm after is ensuring the spec gets done right. If the council has y'all doing it, then I have to deal with you guys (whether I like it or not :) ~harring
pgpUaZmKcTLwG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
