On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:46:41 +0000 Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephen Bennett wrote: > > Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> The EAPI=0 document was supposed to be a QA project. What it is > >> now, I have no idea. > > > > A QA subproject which has not yet released a public draft. > > > And it doesn't concern you that after x months, Chris had no idea > what it was?
Chris had no idea what it was because he was being mislead by all the people going around making absurd claims in this thread. > >> What the Council is interested > >> in is a specification of expected behavior of an EAPI=0 compatible > >> package manager. > > > > Which is exactly what PMS is. > > Except it's one that needs Paludis ready before it can be considered > complete. It's supposed to be a specification, not a description of one program. Had you read the thread, you'd know that already. > /me thinks are they really that clever? /me remembers > ciaranm's incredibly smart posts from ~2 years ago when he couldn't > stand being treated like a noob. Which is supposed to mean what? > >> We asked for a specification. If the PMS > >> team is unable or unwilling to provide us with what we asked under > >> the terms we asked for it > > > > We're working to provide it. So far, I haven't been asked for it > > under any particular terms other than "at some point in the future, > > and we realise that it will take a while to finish". > > Glad to hear it'll be here in a fortnight. See what a little free and > open competition (or even the threat of it) can do? Welcome to the > GPL. This thread has slowed PMS down, not sped it up... And, uh, the GPL doesn't come into it anywhere. Kindly stop. You don't have a clue what you're talking about and your attempts at trolling are highly transparent. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org Web : http://ciaranm.org/ Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
