Stephen Bennett wrote: > Perhaps not implausible in its strictest sense, as it could be done. It > would, however, be a monumentally stupid idea in the general case, if > said user happened to be a contributor upstream to widely-used > packages, or happened to discover an important security bug in such a > package. Leaving users without important applications, or vulnerable to > security holes, because of what is essentially a personal dislike, is > frankly a moronic proposition.
How did this go from not allowing future contributions to *gentoo* projects to not accepting upstream pkgs (that someone gentoo won't deal with has had a hand in)? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
