Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:23:31 -0400:
> On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 04:35 +0000, Duncan wrote: >> * "If you perceive a breach of the Code of Conduct guidelines, let the >> proctors know." How? [N]o general proctor address is listed. > > We had no such alias made, but I'm requesting it to be done. I'll > update the document accordingly once we have the alias. > > I also plan on making it known that users/developers should be able to > also contact any of the local moderation/operation staff for the medium > they're on, meaning they can contact any op in #gentoo or any moderator > in the forums. There's no need to necessarily go directly to the > proctors for everything. Cool. =8^) >> their council term, if elected). Was that really intended? Perhaps it > > Yes, it was intended. Nobody on the Council should be a proctor. I > think you missed that only the *initial* group of proctors includes all > global moderators. By the next council meeting, we plan on having a > much reduced list of proctors to serve in a more permanent role. OK. Makes sense now. I saw the /initial/ but wasn't sure where it was going from there. The further explanation makes sense. Thanks. =8^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
