On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 01:50:19AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 23 March 2007, Josh Saddler wrote: > > I'm very strongly against using Gentoo SoC time and resources for things > > that are not officially part of Gentoo (yes, this statement could be > > spun however you wish) or are not official Gentoo projects. And no, just > > because a project has Gentoo developers in it doesn't mean that it's a > > Gentoo project -- let's avoid the gray areas now, shall we? Just because > > we have Gentoo devs who are also Gnome upstream doesn't make their > > Gnome-related packages that happen to be in our tree official Gentoo > > projects. > > i'd have to agree here > -mike Ditto. Gentoo SoC projects need to be for Gentoo developed and sponsored code/projects, not third party projects, no matter how much they would whither and die without a gentoo core. There was an example of gentoo+gnome integration (i think) in a previous email - that wouldn't be any more appropriate. Unless there's the Gentoo Inc copyright in the header, it isn't eligible in my opinion.
~mcummings, the other mike -- -----o()o---------------------------------------------- Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E -----o()o---------------------------------------------- Hi, I'm a .signature virus! Please copy me in your ~/.signature.
pgpaXhlsVZ3GD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
