On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 03:33:59AM +0000, Duncan wrote:
> Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> excerpted below, on  Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:56:25 -0400:
> 
> > This means that we may be pushing for 2.6.21 stable on x86 and amd64 on
> > May 17th. If important issues come up (which they may well do), this
> > will obviously be delayed, but do keep this date in mind.
> 
> As I'm sure you are aware, there are more known regressions remaining 
> this time around.  As with some others, I'm not all that confident this 
> kernel was ready for release just yet.  Oh, well, I suppose there'll be a 
> 2.6.21.1 and etc...

As no one was actually fixing any of the remaining bugs that were
reported, what were the kernel developers supposed to do, just sit
around and wait another week for no reason?

Now we have more people testing :)

And yes, this release might be a bit more unstable due to the large core
changes, but in my testing, I have had no problems.

thanks,

greg k-h
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to