Thilo Bangert wrote: > Hi everybody, > > the following list of packages uses a invalid <herd> tag in its > metadata.xml. Invalid in the sense of 'could-not-be-found-in-herds.xml' > > Most of them appear to be simple mis-spellings or minor misunderstandings. > Others may lack an entry in herds.xml (s390?). > > AFAICT most packages have straight forward fixes, which will be applied in > about 24 hours. Beat me to it if you want or stop my insanity by speaking > up. > > All packages with <herd>maintainer-needed</herd> will be moved to > <herd>no-herd</herd>. > > kind regards > Thilo > maintainer-needed is different from no-herd. no-herd is valid when a dev is maintaining a pkg outside of a herd. no-herd is not valid for when the package is entirely unmaintained, maintainer-needed would be a better tag for it. I would not make that change.
I tried to fix up your list and found a handful of the packages not even in existence in the tree. Can you re-run this with a fully up to date tree? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
