-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:29:47 -0500 > Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> (As an aside, I didn't realize that Roy's e-mail was supposed to >> be a proctor directive.) > > He changed the subject and signed "on behalf of gentoo-proctors". > >> Is there a way to fix the current system, or should it be chucked >> entirely, as has been suggested? > > The problem is not so much the system as a small number of the > proctors. Perhaps it should be restaffed with people who aren't so used > to wielding god-like powers on the forums, where anyone who dares say > anything that disagrees with a small clique's collective views can > be banned permanently with no accountability. > Or... perhaps when asked not to respond to a thread for 24 hours, you could keep your fucking trap shut? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGZtZx1c+EtXTHkJcRAosHAJ42XbbNLSEaOVeLtAcEvTFMrmhAvQCggR5l NKfMVHNa0HuInct529dbI0s= =s4+3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
