William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > That's the beauty of both upstream design and reality. > > THERE IS NO NEED FOR ESELECT > But eselect makes gentoo so 3l337.. ;) > Apps will either use and/or be developed for gnupg-1 or gnupg-2. They > are different binaries, versioned by upstream. Have different features > and functionality. Since gnupg-2 is not a full replacement or supports > all of gnupg-1's features. > > Think gtk vs gtk2 or apache vs apache2. We quite commonly have two > versions of something in tree during the transition period. Why that is > unacceptable here is beyond me. > Sounds fine to me; is there any technical reason why that wouldn't work?
> Not to mention again, we are limiting choice, and forcing one or the > other. Which is not a complete solution, and makes our offerings less > than all other mainstream distros. > Good points. Imo, you should get some scripts together and do it in your cvs and prove it; if it works, there'll be one less reason to argue about it. If not you can roll it back and try again. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
