On 6/11/07, Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3) said increase means proctors/devrel have more work (meaning more
> random outbursts at the proctors/devrel when folks realize that they
> *are* going to enforce the behaviour rules, and that the outburstes
> can be punished too).
It should probably be made clear beforehand then that these rules are
still in effect.
A semi processed Idea: Instead of proctors using censorship on
selected persons, and seeing that the -politics/-project channel will
attract more flies than others, if the proctors whish to provide a
totally unbiased form of temporary censorship, they could just rate
limit /all/ users uniformly untill its been ascertained that the
heat/problem/troll has died down/diminish/quit
I propose a logarithmic binary back-off strategy, so it wont penalize
people unless they're intending on posting more than twice ;)
--
Kent
ruby -e '[1, 2, 4, 7, 0, 9, 5, 8, 3, 10, 11, 6, 12, 13].each{|x|
print "enNOSPicAMreil [EMAIL PROTECTED]"[(2*x)..(2*x+1)]}'
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
