Wulf C. Krueger wrote: > KDE4 will make use of cmake-utils.eclass we wrote because
Why call it cmake-utils?
> - we need use_enable- and use_with-like functions for cmake (makes ebuilds
> easier to read)
Could be done.
> - in-source and out-of-source build support
Got it too :)
> - we need LIB_SUFFIX support
Could be added easily.
> - our KDE4 eclasses rely on it.
Not in tree yet.
> You might want to take a look at it. It's in the tree. I don't really
> think we need two implementations.
I think so too. I've got few suggestions:
* in cmake-utils_src_make():
emake [EMAIL PROTECTED] - it would allow something like this:
cmake-utils_src_make -j1
* if you `cd' into build directory - *please* return to ${S} -> use pushd/popd.
Last thing: please reply to gentoo-dev too :)
--
Krzysiek Pawlik <nelchael at gentoo.org> key id: 0xBC555551
desktop-misc, desktop-dock, x86, java, apache, ppc...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
