On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:46:44 +0100 Thomas de Grenier de Latour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007/12/19, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:12:24 +0100 > > Thomas de Grenier de Latour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You're done as long as ebuilds are written in bash. > > > > Not even that. What if people decide that rather than writing > > EAPI="blah", "eapi blah" is cleaner? > > Yeah, and file names suffixes won't work anymore as soon as it has > arbitrarily been decided that prefixes should be used instead, or that > EAPI must disappear because using explicit sets of named features is > better than using names of some particular sets. That rules only holds > as long as they don't change is not an argument, but a truism.
Uh, it works in both those cases. The package manager will simply not see the ebuild at all. Which is pretty much the point... -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
