On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 01:37:28PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote: > "Santiago M. Mola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Having a complete > > deptree and having a small system package set should be independent > > goals, maybe your proposal should focus on making possible to have a > > deptree as complete as possible independently of what packages are on > > system set. > > QA team already rejected such a proposal.
Don't suppose you have a url for their reasoning? Among other things, system set can vary, thus resulting in horked dependencies. Additionally, a more accurate dep details is useful for parallelization hints- breaking the reliance on system set as much as possible, and treating it more like a users world set is something I've wanted for a long while. ~brian
pgps58jcS0xp8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
