On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:44:22 +0200
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you think about adding support to base.eclass for running
> eautoreconf?
>
> so instead of
>
> src_unpack() {
> unpack ${A}
> cd "${A}"
> eautoreconf
> }
>
> would just add
>
> EAUTORECONF="yes"
> inherit base
>
> Regards,
> Petteri
>
And if you can't run eautoreconf but instead one of specific commands,
eautoconf, eautomake..
Or what if you need to run AT_M4DIR="/path/to/macros" eautoreconf?
Or when you are about to remove eautoreconf, spot that fbsd is
keyworded and need to substitute it with elibtoolize to avoid
.so version breakage wouldn't it be easier to convert from what
we use now?
What about WANT_ variables?
-drac
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
