On Wednesday 27 February 2008 14:21:58 Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 27-02-2008 13:56:51 +0000, Roy Marples wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:29:15 +0100, Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > Well... that's great! But a jail or a (ch)root is in general not the > > > same as a "prefix". > > > > No, but it's the same kettle of fish as chroots, jails and vps systems - > > basically > > there is a need to disable dependencies that provide what the host > > already does. > > Ok, the host will for instance do "net", so "need net" should indeed not > fail. However I could imagine that "need net" would just get satisfied > or something, like by a dummy.
Correct. lu_zero wanted OpenRC to work out of the box in a vanilla fbsd jail, hence the keyword instead of dummy scripts. > > If OpenRC compiles and /bin/sh points to a POSIX shell it should work as > > it stands. > > Ok, then we already fail here. > /bin/sh is no way POSIX, it is just bourne, so that's where we come in > and simply use /usr/bin/env {sh,bash,posix-sh} or a full path to make > your assumption true. make SH=/usr/local/bin/bash now tweaks all the scripts accordingly. Thanks Roy -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list