Mike Auty kirjoitti:
Petteri Räty wrote:Defining required amount of activity for ebuild devs. I would like us to raise the required amount of activity for ebuild devs.Given that the low number of developers is ranked as our number one problem in Donnie's informal survey[1], taking any kind of action against infrequently-committing developers is likely to reduce the number of devs we have, and potentially make the problem worse.What benefits are you aiming to get from the suggestion? I can think og keeping the books tidy and reducing management time required to maintain the devs. Are there others I've missed? If they're worth the cost/effort involved with putting someone through the dev tests and getting them trained, then it seems a good idea, but otherwise probably not...Mike 5:) [1] http://dberkholz.wordpress.com/2008/02/21/redux-gentoos-top-3-issues/
If you can't manage weekly commits, you can't respond to security issues either. This means that you should have devaway on.
Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
