On Wed, 07 May 2008 16:23:12 +0300 Mart Raudsepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, > > Over the course of this year, a lzma-utils buildtime dependency has > been added to a few system packages, to handle .tar.lzma tarballs. > This has huge implications on the requirement of the system toolchain, > which is highly disturbing from a minimal (lets say embedded) systems > concern - lzma-utils depends on the C++ compiler and the libstdc++ > beast, while a minimal system would like to avoid this at all cost. The new lzma-utils codebase uses liblzma, written in C. It's at the alpha stage but supposedly supports encoding/decoding the current lzma format "well enough" (;P). It probably has some fun bugs to find and squish. http://sf.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=200804251652.58484.lasse.collin%40tukaani.org&forum_name=lzmautils-announce -- fonts, gcc-porting, by design, by neglect mips, treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
