On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:57:28 -0700 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can't we just treat them like other ebuilds except for the thing > about dependencies? Perhaps more fine-grained attributes could be > added for additional specificity.
Could do, yes, in which case the name should be something like 'zero-resolution-cost' rather than 'virtual'. But since giving more information to the package manager is trivial, we might as well do so. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
