Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:40:10 -0700:
> I'm not suggesting that the ebuild and the package set necessarily need > to have the same name. What I'm suggesting is that we use a > configuration file, distributed with the ebuild repository, to map set > names to ebuilds. This mapping would make the set name independent from > the ebuild name. That should work... and it could be as simple as the ebuild name, plus -set, so for example kde-meta and @kde-meta-set. If users mess /that/ up... is there any hope for them? -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
