On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 14:30:09 +0100 Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > In anticipation of getting GCC 4.3 stabilized sometime, I'd like to > > ask maintainers check if their current stable packages build with > > 4.3, and if not please stabilize a version that does in the near > > future if at all possible. Stabilizing this version is going to be > > a huge job due to the number of packages that don't compile due to > > implicit C++ standard library header dependencies that got cleaned > > up in 4.3.[i], so anything you could do ahead of time to save our > > sanity would be greatly appreciated. > > Is there a bug that is blocked by such stabilisation requests? We > had such a thing on the GCC 4 transition (apart from the normal > porting tracker) and was really handy. I will rebuild three x86 > systems (one totally stable, two mostly) to check. There is now: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=245160 Thanks for the help. :) -- gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
