Peter Volkov a écrit :
> В Вск, 16/11/2008 в 21:13 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue пишет:
>> here is a list of packages gnome herd would like to get rid of since
>> no-one seem to take care of them and users are not so verbose about it
>> either:
>>
>>  * app-text/ggv https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223427
> 
> Upstream there was a discussion of interest. Pointing at random mail in
> that tread:
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-hackers/2006-July/msg00008.html
> So there are people which prefer ggv over evince...

Nothing more recent than that? 2 1/2 years ago seems pretty far away...

The last meaningful commit was done a little over 3 years ago...

> For ggv it seems that
> it's better to leave it as is. May be just stabilize the most recent
> version - let arch teams test it and if it works no need to remove it
> from the tree.

ggv is a dead project. Upstream refused to fix performance issues I had
with it a few years ago. Evince is _now_ both faster and prettier (I
agree it wasn't true at first, ggv was much faster)

I'd rather we take ggv out of portage. We'd be doing our users a big favor.

Cheers

Rémi

Reply via email to