Doug Goldstein wrote: > Petteri Räty wrote: >> Branko Badrljica wrote: >> >>> Since I might not be the only tinkerer on Gentoo to try stuff like that >>> and since it took me a day to find this, maybe it wouldn't hurt to check >>> for this kind of thing in portage ? >>> At the very least failed cp should stop emerge... >>> >>> >>> >> >> Well there isn't a single place to add die statements. The important >> thing is for ebuild developers to remember to add || die to all stuff >> that could potentially fail. If you find the cp in question that failed >> for you, the right place to file bugs is https://bugs.gentoo.org. >> >> Regards, >> Petteri >> >> > Looks like people have been truly over-zealous when removing "die" > statements from ebuilds lately. I've added back to HAL an assortment of > "die" statements. > > I hope this hasn't happened in too many other ebuilds. >
Who has been removing die statements? Is this a suggested way of action somewhere by someone? Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
