On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:06:45 +0000 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:03:17 -0600 > Ryan Hill <dirtye...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > I'm really hoping this isn't a stable candidate. :P > > Is an earlier gcc 4.3 a stable candidate, or have those plans been > abandoned? > > (I'm wondering whether it's worth the pain of dealing with 4.1's lack > of tr1 regex support...) I was hoping to have the tree ready by Mar/Apr. Flameeyes dug up a lot of broken packages with his tinderbox runs that need addressing though. I'm going to go through the list, posting patches next week. Then we have to wait until they can be stabilized. Which reminds me - maintainers, if you have a bug blocking #245547 that you have not yet CC'd arches on, do so now please. Most of these were opened in November and haven't seen any action. Thanks. -- gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
