On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:45:44 -0700 Joe Peterson <lava...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Then why don't you come up with a viable solution? > > I already have - look back at my posts; very similar to Rich0's idea.
No, I said viable. > And I tire of the argument that if one doesn't have a perfect solution > now, we should adopt a half-brained one. The point of this is to spur > discussion to come up with a better solution. We have a perfect solution. > > For the same reason they're willing to accept the package name and > > version in the filename. > > The fact that you think this is the same thing as having the EAPI in > the filename is odd. PN and PV are metadata, same as EAPI. > > "If you paint the bikeshed, I shall throw my toys out of the pram > > and run off crying.". > > > > Why don't you propose a viable alternative instead of making > > threats? > > Not a threat. And this will be my last post on the topic. I will not > take your bate and continue to argue, creating more noise on this > list - I've expressed how I feel. This isn't about how you feel. It's about what you rationally think, based upon a full understanding of the issues at hand. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
