On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:19:20AM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 23:12 Tue 24 Feb , Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > Here's the preliminary agenda. I'm running a bit behind on -dev, so > > it's a little out of date re GLEPs 54/55. People including lu_zero, > > cardoe, dev-zero, and tanderson should fill us in on things below that > > they've taken responsibility for. Anyone else can chime in anywhere! > > I'm not prepared to decide on the whole set of solutions related to GLEP > 55 yet. I need more time to think about them, and since new options are > showing up frequently, it makes that pretty hard. Here's what action I'd > like to see regarding the whole thing:
A delay would actually be useful. Folks (outside of the ml) have made some claims that can be disproven/proven via prototyping a pm. I won't get it today, but week or so should be enough to nail down the performance cases, backwards compatibility, etc. ~harring
pgpih0jcq1QXZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
