-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:20:09 -0700 > Zac Medico <zmed...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> Actually, after further inspection of PMS, it seems that the >> IUSE_IMPLICIT is more appropriate for the 'prefix' flag since it >> doesn't seem to fit into the USE_EXPAND paradigm. > > Were we after keeping IUSE_IMPLICIT? That whole part is still fairly > vague, since I'm not sure what Portage is going to be able to do with > it in time for EAPI 3.
Well, portage already supports the notion of IUSE_IMPLICIT internally, so it won't be much work to modify it to support whatever changes we decide to do in EAPI 3 (if any). - -- Thanks, Zac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknXt+8ACgkQ/ejvha5XGaNVQgCgkVtqb9+7gnvtVPjc8OaJexAh txAAn32l6SWtt2eUJ5Zzfjmcx9urrnxe =gash -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
