On Monday 13 April 2009 17:17:36 Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > So we are now a year later, > > some people are getting excited at getting rid of .la files again but no > decent solution has been presented yet that I am aware of. We've had two > situations recently: > * https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264249 which got > reverted > * https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=266016 which author of > the change don't want to revert > > My questions are simple: > * do we have a plan ? I mean something real, not people doing > stuff in their "territory" or "lonewolves". > * do we want to *harm* our users base by changing this starting > from low level libs ?
it either moves ahead sanely, or it doesnt move ahead at all. Bug 266016 is an example of doing it wrong for no real benefit whatsoever. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
