On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 18:17 +0200, Mounir Lamouri wrote: [...] > I think the code can be considered GPL-2 (i will check if there is no > header specifying something else) and for the fonts, I will have to add > 2 licenses not in the tree at the moment. > But what to do with the songs ? I suppose it's not the first GPL game > having "non very clear" license about data. How games team is managing > that ?
The fonts license seems to be the same as licenses/BitstreamVera which is in-tree. As for the songs, does it make sense to put that in a separate package that the code package depends on? The package can have the restrictive license it is distributed under and RESTRICT="mirror bindist". -- Arun
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
