2009-08-12 20:41:30 Tomáš Chvátal napisał(a): > Dne středa 12 Srpen 2009 19:58:05 Jeremy Olexa napsal(a): > > I am suggesting that the new 10.0 profiles be marked as EAPI-2 > > compliant. This involves setting the content of the 'eapi' file to "2" > > and bumping up the required portage version. > > > > This seems like progress to me. Often, developers are complaining that > > they can't use SLOT syntax in profiles (I know that is EAPI-1). Since, > > the only time we can bump EAPI syntax in profiles is upon a new > > directory creation, this seems like a good time to me. The new > > profiles are still in flux until the official stages/cd's are > > produced. > > > > Also, another good reason is: "why not?" I don't think any Gentoo user > > can avoid EAPI-2 up til now anyway. > > > > Any comments? No comments means it will be decided off-list. > > Timeframe: 1 week from now. > > -Jeremy > Agreed. This is great idea. > Also we should allow the stuff as directory thingus (portage already handles > it right). > package.mask/koffice-2 > package.mask/live-gnome > ....
+1. -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
