On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:25:35 +0200 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfre...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 2009-08-13 07:55:22 Ryan Hill napisał(a): > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:46:56 +0100 > > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:41:30 +0200 > > > Tomáš Chvátal <scarab...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > Also we should allow the stuff as directory thingus (portage already > > > > handles it right). > > > > > > That's a seperate thing that needs EAPI control. You'll need to propose > > > it for EAPI 4 if you want that. > > > > Why is that (seriously curious, not disagreeing)? Portage has supported > > this > > for quite a while now. Does the current PMS disallow it? > > Portage documentation has been properly fixed (and the fix will be released > in next version) and this feature can now be used in 10.0 profiles. How does changing the portage documentation magically add this to the PMS? -- fonts, Character is what you are in the dark. gcc-porting, wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
