On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:56:41 +0100 David Leverton <levert...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Does anyone have any opinions on which of the four options (#1 > make die respect nonfatal, #2 make die always die, #3 add a new > die variant that respects nonfatal, #4 make regular die respect > nonfatal, and add a new variant that doesn't) we should go with? > We should definitely get this resolved and agreed on before EAPI > 3 is finalised. I'd like die to respect nonfatal. People using nonfatal should check beforehand that the functions they're calling won't do anything stupid if die's are ignored. If there's something that absolutely has to die, nonfatal or not, then use a variable. I guess that's #4? -- fonts, Character is what you are in the dark. gcc-porting, wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
