2009-09-20 18:51:53 Robert Buchholz napisał(a): > On Sunday 20 September 2009, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > Some packages (whose older versions might be stable) might soon start > > requiring Python 3. Stabilization of these packages cannot be delayed > > due to the fact that some other packages don't work with Python 3. > > Of course they can. That is exactly the reason I am using a distribution > (instead of LFS), because I expect maintainers of packages to > coordinate and define a working set of packages for me to use. This > includes holding back updates, fast-tracking updates, forward- and > backward-porting. Automatisms in updates and blindly following upstream > removes that extra value we are there to provide.
I agree. But Python 3.1 doesn't have more issues than Python 2.6, so the stabilization is reasonable. -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
