On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:55:55 +0400 Alexey Shvetsov <ale...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Воскресенье 20 сентября 2009 11:47:30 Rémi Cardona wrote: > > Le 20/09/2009 02:31, Ryan Hill a écrit : > > > If not, when can > > > we drop support for old EAPIs? Your opinions please. > > > > Let's drop it now. We've waited long enough. Portage with EAPI=2 has > > been stable for more than a year. > > > > Rémi > > > Yes its good idea to drop EAPI<2 from tree, but we should provide a way to > upgrade for people that don't upgrades recently. So we can: > 1 create a portage snapshot > 2 write mini how to about upgrade > 3 then drop EAPI=0 and EAPI=1 from tree to simplify tree We're talking about system packages, not the whole tree. There are 19951 ebuilds that don't declare EAPI and 1705 with EAPI=1 or EAPI="1". Even with a policy that all new ebuilds need to be EAPI 2, converting the entire tree would be several years of work IMO, at which point we'll be at EAPI zillion+1. -- fonts, Character is what you are in the dark. gcc-porting, wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
