On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 01:06:22PM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > for various reasons/limitations/bugs/whatever, i rewrote epatch. seems to > > work for me, but in case someone wants to check before i release: > > Wouldn't it be safer to let this run on, say, Patrick's or Deigo's > tinderboxes for a day or so before pushing this to eutils? > > Murphy's law becomes more applicable as the affected domain of a > change increases :)
Err... that's a damn fine idea actually, although it requires getting them to agree to it. For changes of this sort, abusing the tinderboxes to get a real world test run makes a lot of sense. Diego/Patrick- thoughts? ~harring
pgp2zwDLjCwCS.pgp
Description: PGP signature