On Sunday 17 January 2010 16:12:29 David Leverton wrote: > On Sunday 17 January 2010 20:38:48 Petteri Räty wrote: > > With GLEP 42 and proper logging of e* messages I think we shouldn't > > annoy users any more with ebeep or epause so attached is a patch only > > defines these functions for EAPIs 0, 1 and 2. Anyone have a reason to > > keep these around for EAPI 3? If not I will apply the attached patch. > > The eclass-manpages comments should be updated too.
you mean you should re-emerge it on your system -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
