On 02/27/10 17:22, Mark Loeser wrote: > I think the goal was to have http://bugday.gentoo.org/ fill this role
whenever i visit bugday.gentoo.org it takes minutes to load. afair for the two bugdays i participated it didn't display anything helpful (to me), especially: why does it show fixed bugs, too? about half of them are fixed. section "new, requests for ebuilds, or just a version bump" doesn't have a single bug after 2006, that's how "new" it is. > instead of polluting bugzie with more keywords. would a single keyword be pollution? > I'm not really attached > to one approach over the other, but atleast this little site gives the > users one place to have to check for things and we can categorize them > easily. what i see as an advantage of the bugzilla-keyword approach is that any developer can contribute: everyone (especially bug wranglers) can mark bugs for bugday easily from bugzilla. bugday.gentoo.org could still be used as an entry point showing these bugs. sebastian
