On 07-04-2010 00:21, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:06:24AM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: >> Why not just get rid of the in-tree Changelogs entirely? The scm >> logs already document this information, so why have it in a file? > The major concern with this is users that are NOT connected to the > internet always. > If you are connected, you can just use --exclude Changelog in your rsync > options. >
That's a good point. But can't we generate the ChangeLogs automatically from git on the main rsync server?
